Showing posts with label ChatGPT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ChatGPT. Show all posts

Thursday, September 28, 2023

Hidden Expectations of College Application Essays - from Marshall Memo 998 8/14/2023

 Hidden Expectations of College Application Essays

In this American Journal of Education article, Sarah Beck (New York University) and

Amanda Godley (University of Pittsburgh) say the decision by many colleges to make SAT

and ACT scores optional, along with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on race-based

affirmative action, have made the application essay more important than ever. “The pressure is

on college applicants,” say Beck and Godley, “to illustrate the kinds of nonacademic factors

increasingly prized in applicants – namely, attitude – and so-called performance factors such as

teamwork, leadership, grit, and motivation.”

Beck and Godley analyzed college essays that were identified as exemplary by college

admissions staffers at four highly selective U.S. colleges, and also studied the advice given by

several groups to students writing college essays. Some common themes from the latter:

- Convey your identity, personality, uniqueness, values, thoughts.

- Present a unique topic.

- Reflect your maturity, introspection, grit, drive, curiosity.

- Provide new information (not a repeat of other parts of the application).

- Stick with the same main idea throughout.

- Give details, “show don’t tell,” be concise, don’t use clichés.

- Don’t be formal, but be clear and proofread your essay.

- Use your “voice and style.”

- Stand out from others.

- Demonstrate that you are a good, creative writer.

- Show how you will fit at this school and contribute to the community.

Beck and Godley believe the college essay is a unique genre that most high-school

students have not had exposure to. “Given the lack of alignment between the college

application essay genre and traditional school-assignment genres,” say the authors, “we are

concerned that emphasis on these essays for admissions decisions may continue to

disadvantage first-generation, racially and linguistically minoritized, and low-income students

in underresourced schools. Students with access to extra financial and human resources

increasingly receive the additional guidance needed to discern the hidden expectation of this

genre, whereas those with fewer resources do not.”

Beck and Godley identified a number of characteristics in the 20 highly-rated college

essays they analyzed, including:

- The use of an extended metaphor – for example, a tortilla, a Greek island, a bridge, a

pickle truck, Chuck Taylor shoes;

- Presenting themselves as good creative writers with maturity, introspection, grit, drive,

and curiosity;

- Standing out from the crowd, frequently indicated by the applicant’s cultural

background – “I am Puerto Rican and Irish and French and Polish and all these

backgrounds have allowed me to see unique perspectives.”

- A niche interest – Legos, music, fly-fishing, rock-climbing, nanomedicine, farming,

potatoes, soccer, creative writing;

- Presenting themselves as “authentic, distinctive, and a suitable fit for membership in

the community;”

- Exemplary essays avoided direct self-appraisal, instead referring to the reactions of

others: “My climbing partners say that I take the most unorthodox routes when

climbing, but ironically they’re the most natural and comfortable paths for me.”

- Including micronarratives – short, embedded stories – and vivid imagery;

- Mixing exposition and narrative in effective ways.

“This structure,” say Beck and Godley, referring to the last item on the list above, “illuminated

one of the ways in which the genre of college admissions essays is quite different from the

genres of essays typically taught in schools – such as literacy analysis, persuasion, and

personal narrative – and why this genre can be particularly confusing for students who do not

have access to expert guidance in the essay-writing process.”

Beck and Godley have these pointers for teachers, counselors, and parents preparing

students to write effective college essays:

• Expose students to literary journalistic essays (such as those in The New Yorker) that

combine personal narrative, persuasion through compelling example, and scientific findings on

data in novel ways that bring issues and ideas to life for readers. “Studying and emulating

multiple examples of such published essays,” they say, “is one approach that teachers and

counselors could take to provide support for students writing the new and unfamiliar genre of

college admissions essays.”

• Explicitly discuss with students “the aspects of self that admissions offices seem to

value,” giving them agency for the “cultural expectations for the representation and sharing of

the self with unknown readers.”

• The topics, vocabulary, and syntax of successful college essays are a linguistic resource

that can be taught to all students and form an important part of the “tool kit of academic

literacy skills” needed to vault over disadvantages.

• Beck and Godley discussed ChatGPT with college admissions officers and were told

that at least so far, artificial intelligence is incapable of emulating “the compelling personal

voice that distinguishes outstanding essays that improve applicants’ chances for acceptance at

elite colleges.”

“‘What Makes You, You’: The Discursive Construction of the Self in US College Application

Essays” by Sarah Beck and Amanda Godley in American Journal of Education, August 2023

(Vol. 129, #4, p. 539-564); the authors can be reached at sarah.beck@nyu.edu and

VPGodley@pitt.edu .

Thursday, February 23, 2023

How to Use ChatGPT in Class

 From this Edutopia article: "Some ideas for Using ChatGPT in Middle and High School Classes"

SPOT THE COMPUTER ESSAY 

John Warner, blogger for Inside Higher Ed and author of Why They Can’t Write: Killing the Five-Paragraph Essay and Other Necessities, reminds us that these tools are only rearranging words and not applying feeling, heart, or other emotional components; the results lack energy. In a language arts classroom, we might describe such a piece of writing as having a weak “voice.”

For a playful exercise, share two or three pieces of human writing from the past year or two and slip in an example from ChatGPT, and have students discuss what makes these examples human—or decidedly not. Nuance, passion, and, perhaps, even fallibility will be clues that students can investigate.

USE PRIMARY SOURCES AND FIRST-PERSON ACCOUNTS 

My colleague Joy Xu in the English department asks students to interview someone and connect this person’s experience to a text. First of all, the narrative/expository combination provides more points of entry for student writing.

Second, this synthesis ensures that no machine prompt can provide language to express new learning.

COMPARE TWO READINGS 

Peter Greene, a senior writer for Forbes magazine and a high school English teacher of nearly 40 years, suggests that we require students “to compare and contrast a pair of literary works (provided the comparison is not a time-worn one).”

Students will create unique essays that demonstrate their learning, the connections they’ve made, and the meaning. Again, because these AI tools are trained on what can be found on the internet, the rarer the story, the rarer the computer-generated analysis.

EXPECT CLASSROOM DISCUSSION TO BE USED AS A RESOURCE 

This idea, loosely based on another Peter Greene suggestion, considers a key component of what he calls “authentic writing” class discussions. He recommends that the discussion “[become] one of the texts being considered.”

A rather positive result that would likely emerge from this idea would be students paying closer attention during classroom conversations. Dare I say they may even take notes?

ChatGPT: What to do what it happens?

 From Edweek article by Alyson Klein: link

1. Make your expectations very clear

Students need to know what exactly constitutes cheating, whether AI tools are involved or not.“Every school or district needs to put stakes in the ground [on a] policy around academic dishonesty, and what that means specifically,” said Michelle Brown, the founder and CEO of CommonLit. Schools can decide how much or how little students can rely on AI to make cosmetic changes or do research, she said, and should make that clear to students. She recommended “the heart of the policy [be] about allowing students to do intellectually rigorous work.”

2. Talk to students about AI in general and ChatGPT in particular

If it appears a student may have passed off ChatGPT’s work as their own, sit down with them one on one, CommonLit and Quill recommend. Then talk about the tool and AI in general. Questions could include: Have you heard of ChatGPT? What are other students saying about it? What do you think it should be used for? Discuss the promises—and potential pitfalls—of artificial intelligence.

3. If students use ChatGPT for an assignment, they must attribute what material they used from it

If students are allowed to use ChatGPT or another AI tool for research or other help, let them know how and why they should credit that information, Brown said. Since users can’t link back to a ChatGPT response, she suggested students share the prompt they used to generate the information in their citation.

4. Ask students directly if they used ChatGPT

If students say “yes,” Romoslawski likes to get a sense of why. “More often than not, the student was just struggling on the assignment. They had a roadblock. They didn’t know what to do,” he said. “They were crunched for time, because we’re a high-achieving high school and our students are taking some pretty rigorous courses. This was their third homework assignment of the night and they just wanted to get through it.”

5. Don’t rely on ChatGPT detectors alone to determine if there was cheating

There are a number of tools—including one from OpenAI, ChatGPT’s developer—that purport to be able to distinguish an AI-crafted story or essay from one written by a human. But most of these detectors don’t publish their accuracy rates. And those that do are ineffective about 10 to 20 percent of the time.

6. Make it clear why learning to write on your own is important

Students in general, and particularly students who take advantage of AI to cheat, need to understand what they are missing out on when they take a technology-enabled shortcut. Educators should try to persuade students that learning to write on their own will help them reason and think, or be critical to future job success, Gault said.

But others will need a more immediate incentive. The strongest argument one teacher came up with, according to Quill’s Gault? Tell students that learning to write will make them more persuasive, and therefore, “you can convince your parents to do what you want.”