Wednesday, February 28, 2024

Clarity on Race/SAT and the Texas model

 NYT - new clarity on SAT and race based admissions 


The Texas model

The situation has become clearer because the Supreme Court last week declined to hear a lawsuit against a public magnet school in Northern Virginia — Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, known as T.J.

Until recently, T.J. admitted students based on a mix of grades, test scores, student essays and teacher recommendations. This process led to a student body that looked very different from the area it served.

About 5 percent of T.J. students were Black or Hispanic, even though the surrounding area is about 37 percent Black or Hispanic. The school also enrolled few low-income students of every race, as Richard Kahlenberg of Georgetown University has noted. Only 2 percent of Asian students at T.J. came from low-income families, compared with 20 percent of Asian students in the surrounding area.

In 2021, though, T.J. switched to a new admissions policy. It was modeled after a bipartisan plan that Texas created in 1997, under Gov. George W. Bush. In T.J.’s version, the school filled most of its freshman class by accepting the top 1.5 percent of students at every public middle school in the area.

The underlying idea is simple enough. Many communities in the U.S. are economically and racially homogenous. But a policy that accepts the top students from every community can create diverse classes. The policy is defensible on meritocratic grounds because it rewards teenagers who excel in every environment — and on political grounds because it gives all communities access to desirable schools.

Once T.J. changed its policy, the school became much more diverse. The share of students from low-income families rose to 25 percent from 2 percent. Racial diversity also increased:

A chart showing demographics of all public schools in Fairfax County, Va., compared with those of the specialized high school Thomas Jefferson's classes of 2024 and 2025.
Source: Fairfax County Public Schools | By The New York Times

“I love T.J.,” Kaiwan Bilal, one of the students accepted under the new policy, told The Washington Post. “It’s even better than I expected, better than my parents told me it would be.” Bilal also said that he was struck by the school’s diversity.

Wednesday, February 14, 2024

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Using Classroom Discussion as a Summative

 Interesting Edutopia article about discussion structures and prep.


One compelling sideline of the article:

I like to tease these questions throughout the unit. Since I’m a science teacher, my units are driven by phenomena, so I am always coming back to the driving phenomenon we are working to explain. 

My students answer a lesson question each day (which I use instead of a traditional objective or learning target), so the idea of having layers of questions makes sense to them. When we finally arrive at the end of the unit, students are ready to synthesize their learning about the questions we’ve been working to answer.

Friday, February 9, 2024

Literature: Histories Revealed

 from Marshall Memo 1022

Recommended Young Adult Novels with a Different Twist

            In this English Journal article, Saba Khan Vlach (University of Iowa) recommends prize-winning young adult books that are different from the more-common “hero’s journey,” where the lead character is separated from family and friends and embarks on a journey of self-discovery and comes of age. In the five books Vlach spotlights, “The protagonists… become, not because their family histories have been taken away or diminished in importance, but because those histories are revealed to them.” 

-   Maizy Chen’s Last Chance by Lisa Yee, middle grades

-   Hollow Fires by Samira Ahmed, grade 7-12

-   The Summer of Bitter and Sweet by Jen Ferguson, grade 7 and up

-   We Deserve Monuments by Jas Hammonds, grade 8 and up

-   All My Rage by Sabaa Tahir, grade 8 and up

 

“The Honor List of 2022 Prize-Winning Young Adult Books: Family Stories in YA Literature” by Saba Khan Vlach in English Journal, November 2023 (Vol. 113, #2, pp. 19-24);

Shanahan on Reading Comprehension Versus Learning

 from Marshall Memo 1022

Timothy Shanahan on Reading Comprehension Versus Learning

            In this online article, Timothy Shanahan (University of Illinois/Chicago) distinguishes between reading comprehension and learning from a text. “It’s an important distinction if we seek to teach reading effectively,” he says. Here are his thoughts on each:

            • Comprehension – This is basically grasping the meaning and meaningfulness of what’s read, which is important to getting it into memory. Some see teaching comprehension as mostly for the elementary grades. Before the current emphasis on reading strategies, comprehension instruction was often about having students practice answering questions about passages. The increasing emphasis on teaching reading strategies was supposed to make students active readers, applying their metacognition, practicing discrete skills (main idea, inferencing) being aware of whether they were understanding, and being able to apply the skills to new texts.

            • Learning – Advocates of knowledge acquisition disagree with the content-agnostic approach of reading strategy instruction – the idea that it doesn’t matter what students read because they can apply the strategies they learn to any text. Learning advocates emphasize the importance of high-quality texts and reading several on a topic to deepen learning. They suggest using more-effective reading strategies than answering questions or highlighting text – for example, asking yourself questions about what you’ve read and summarizing a text in your own words. 

            “Certainly,” says Shanahan, “the knowledge crew is right about the importance of books worth reading. This means science and social studies texts. But it also means reading worthwhile literature (cultural touchstones), and fiction that conveys important things about the human condition (our relationships, our motivations, and so on)… Strategy advocates like these ideas, but strategy instruction can get pretty procedural, without much attention to the content.” 

            However, says Shanahan, neither approach is paying enough attention to teaching students how to comprehend. One stresses reading skills, the other knowledge acquisition. So what are reading teachers supposed to do? Shanahan has these suggestions:

            • In directed or guided reading lessons (where students read a text with the guidance and supervision of a teacher) focus on reading valuable texts from which we want students to gain important content knowledge.

            • Ensure that these texts are challenging. “If kids can comprehend the text on their own,” says Shanahan, “then it is not the right text for a reading lesson.” A major goal in teacher-directed reading lessons is helping students “negotiate the difficulties of a text.”

            • Building deep knowledge requires more than just reading and answering questions. Students should read more than one text on a subject, take part in discussions, presentations, and debates, and write reports, critiques, comparisons, and analyses. 

            • Those who advocate teaching comprehension strategies “should get serious about what constitutes comprehension strategy,” says Shanahan. One truly important skill is self-monitoring – being aware of when our eyeballs are reading but we’re not understanding. “Surprisingly, many students, even college-age students, read with little understanding and do nothing about it,” he says. We need to teach students what to do when they don’t understand a word, when a sentence doesn’t make sense, when they get confused about which character or concept is being talked about. Students need to be taught how to solve these problems on their own and develop the tenacity to persist when they are confused. And, adds Shanahan, don’t allow the study strategies to distract from the content that’s being learned.

            Shanahan concludes with a comment on the commonly used study skill of highlighting text. Researchers have found that this is an ineffective strategy. Why? Because many students don’t have enough understanding of the text to know what’s important, and end up highlighting almost everything. A better approach: provide important background knowledge and teach students an important reading strategy: how to use titles, subheadings, boldfacing, graphics, and other clues authors use to structure meaning. 

 

“I Want My Students to Comprehend; Am I Teaching the Wrong Kind of Strategies?” by Timothy Shanahan in Shanahan on Literacy, February 3, 2024;

Thursday, February 8, 2024

14 Essential Reads for New Teachers

 Edutopia - 14 Essential Reads for New Teachers - https://www.edutopia.org/article/essential-books-new-teachers?utm_content=linkpos6&utm_campaign=weekly-2024-02-07&utm_medium=email&utm_source=edu-legacy